THE GREAT AWAKENING

The Great Awakening-In God We Trust

The Great Reset Snakes Are Slithering Together in Davos FROM MERCOLA

The Great Reset Snakes Are Slithering Together in Davos

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked



STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • The Great Reset involves the demolition and radical overhaul of several interlocking pillars of civilization: technology, society, economy, environment and geopolitics. Food and health also fall within these categories
  • Through control of these core pillars, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its globalist allies intend to seize control of all the nations of the world and centralize all power and wealth
  • The WEF is an organization that profits from famine and disease; it uses tragedies and fear to further its own agenda. It intends to dictate what you eat, what you own and what you think, under the guise of building a “sustainable future”
  • The WEF-led cabal believes in transhumanist and technocratic principles, and the technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check
  • Technocrats actually believe they’re better, more evolved than the rest, and this superiority gives them the right to decide the fate of mankind. They also reject the notion of free will. Once you understand this basic mindset, it’s easier to understand why they think nothing of stripping you of your freedom and ability to make choices for yourself

In the video above, which is part of a larger "Great Reset" documentary series, Rebel News highlights the origins of the World Economic Forum1 (WEF), its founder Klaus Schwab, and other key players, and the WEF's central role in The Great Reset, which promises (read: threatens) to overturn society and life as we know it in ways that are hard to imagine.

In summary, The Great Reset involves the demolition and radical overhaul of several interlocking pillars of civilization: technology, society, economy, environment and geopolitics. Food and health also fall within these categories. Through control of these core pillars, the WEF and its globalist allies intend to seize control of all the nations of the world and centralize all power and wealth.

The WEF's Plan

As noted by Rebel News, the WEF is an organization that profits from famine and disease; it uses tragedies and fear to further its own agenda — "one that dictates what you eat, what you own, what you think, under the guise of a 'sustainable future.'"

According to the WEF, capitalism is dead and we can no longer allow for free markets. Instead, we need a top-down governance, a New World Order, that can ensure "fair and equitable" distribution of dwindling resources, including energy and food. What they're really saying, however, is that soon-to-be-useless people are gobbling up "their" resources. They see us — you and me — as an existential threat to their luxurious lifestyle.

So, their decades-old plan is to seize control of it all, transfer all wealth and private ownership into their own hands, and centrally control who gets what and when. It's important to realize that this WEF-led cabal believes in transhumanist and technocratic principles.

What Is Technocracy?

Technocracy is at its core an economic system, not a political one. However, it's wholly unnatural, and therefore also requires unnatural means to keep it going. Rather than being based on common pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand or free commerce, the economy of technocracy is based on energy resources, which then dictate the types of products being produced, bought, sold and consumed.


The technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check.


In essence, energy replaces the concept of money as a commodity. That's strange enough, but it gets stranger still. Technocracy, which emerged in the 1930s during the height of the Great Depression, the brainchildren of which were scientists and engineers, also requires social engineering to work.

If people are allowed to do what they want, consumer demand ultimately drives commerce, but that won't fly in a technocratic economy. Instead, consumers need to be directed, herded if you will, to consume that which the system needs them to consume, and in order for that to happen, they need to be more or less brainwashed. As a result, the technocratic system requires extensive surveillance and artificial intelligence-driven technologies to keep everyone in check.

Understanding the Mind of the Technocrats

As Schwab himself has declared on many occasions, they want a society in which humans are merged with machine and artificial intelligence (AI). They look forward to extreme longevity, if not immortality through technological means.

They place no value on spiritual ideas such as the survival of the soul. They don't believe in the nonlocality of consciousness. If they did, they wouldn't believe consciousness can simply be uploaded into a synthetic body. They believe that, through technology and AI, they will be able to replace God and the natural order with reengineered lifeforms of their own creation, including a reengineered humanity.

They actually believe they're better, more evolved than the rest of us, and this superiority gives them the right to decide the fate of mankind. They also reject the notion of free will.2 Once you understand this basic mindset, it's easier to understand why they think nothing of stripping you of your freedom and ability to make choices for yourself. As noted by Tessa Lena in "The Mind of a Technocrat: What Drives Them?":

"To a technocrat, a human being is an imperfect machine, a humble meat bag that is operated by software, which is produced by the brain. The technocrat's understanding of life is based on a very primitive, linear vision; it's void of spiritual mystery ...

The force driving the mind of a technocrat is the overbearing emotional need for total control, combined with mistrust for other people in general. They seemingly look to compensate for their emotional poverty. (In other words, there is no reason to admire their successes as their successes are based on theft of other people's right to free will.)

The technocrats' desire to fully control their surroundings is anxiety-driven. They simply can't stand the feeling of uncertainty that comes with allowing other people's subjective choices to play any role. They don't trust others to do the right thing, much like a very neurotic parent doesn't trust his child's ability to choose wisely without supervision — but far less benevolently.

Their desire for control is intensely neurotic. They are sitting on needles, so to speak (a Russian idiom and a pun in the light of today) — and in order to dampen their anxiety, they resort to trying to implement their controlling ambitions ...

Technocrats may think they are the cream of the crop. They may think that their brilliant vision is good for the world. But regardless of whether they believe themselves to be the good guys or the bad guys, their thirst for total control is a pathological, anxiety-driven expression. They can't stand being dependent on other people's free will, and so they aspire to squash it, which is not existentially right."

Annual Meeting in Davos

Each year, the WEF holds a meeting in Davos, Switzerland. Thousands of global movers and shakers fly in on private jets to decide how best to stop the working class from driving gas-powered cars, heating their homes and eating meat. Does anyone still believe that a bunch of billionaire "elites" can make life "fair and equitable" for everyone?

Attendees include corporate executives, bankers and financiers, heads of state, finance and trade ministers, central bankers, policymakers, the heads of international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the Bank for International Settlements, the United Nations and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Many academics, economists, political scientists, journalists, cultural elites and celebrities are also invited.

This year's meeting took place May 22 through 26.3 On the first day, participants were treated to an immersive experience of the metaverse in their own digital avatar. Essentially, this is where they want to bring the masses of mankind — into a digital reality where enjoyment of resources doesn't involve actual use of real-world resources. For example, rather than buying clothes for your biological body, you'll spend digital currency on a wardrobe for your digital avatar.

Day 2 included a discussion about how manufacturing companies can accelerate their implementation of automation. The idea is to replace most of the human workforce with robotics and AI. As you might expect, this will render large portions of humanity superfluous and "useless." What to do with them all? Professor Yuval Noah Harari, a Schwab adviser, has stated he believes the answer will be a combination of "drugs and video games."4

Haves and Have Nots Among Journalists

avi yemini tweet

Among the journalists invited to the 2022 meeting was New York Times managing editor Rebecca Blumenstein. Rebel News reporter Avi Yemini confronted Blumenstein in Davos (video above), asking how the public is supposed to trust the NYT's reporting on the event when she's an invited guest. Blumenstein refused to answer the question, thereby cementing the impression that she's really not there as an independent journalist. She's part of the event. She's part of the club.

Additional evidence that not all journalists are equal was evidenced by the attempt by armed WEF police officers to detain conservative journalist Jack Posobiec (video below).5 When other journalists got involved and started filming and asking questions, the police took off. The fact that the WEF has ITS OWN police force should be a wakeup call. Clearly, they're far more than just another nongovernmental organization (NGO).

Sustainable Development Is Technocracy

Many of the terms we've heard more and more of in recent years refer to technocracy under a different name. Examples include sustainable development, Agenda 21, the 2030 Agenda, the New Urban Agenda, green economy, the green new deal and the climate change movement in general.

They all refer to and are part of technocracy and resource-based economics. Other terms that are synonymous with technocracy include the Great Reset,6 the Fourth Industrial Revolution7 and the slogan Build Back Better.8 The Paris Climate Agreement is also part and parcel of the technocratic agenda.

The common goal of all these movements and agendas is to capture all of the resources of the world — the ownership of them — for a small global elite group that has the know-how to program the computer systems that will ultimately dictate the lives of everyone. It's really the ultimate form of totalitarianism.

When they talk about "wealth redistribution," what they're really referring to is the redistribution of resources from us to them. The WEF has publicly announced that by 2030, you will own nothing. Everything you need you will rent — from them — and deciding factors for what you're allowed to rent will include things like your carbon credits and social credit score.

Gone will be the days of putting in a day's work, receiving a paycheck and spending it to your heart's content. No, the digital currency will be programmable, so the issuer can decide when and what you can spend it on, based on the data in your digital identity. This will all be automated and run by AI, of course, so there won't be anyone to complain to.

What the Green Revolution Is All About

While "going green" sounds and feels like the right thing to do, it's becoming imperative for people to understand what the green agenda is really all about. Shocking as it may sound, the green agenda was invented, fabricated, by the Club of Rome (a scientific think tank allied with the WEF) to justify a depopulation agenda.9

The need for population control is described in the 1972 book, "The Limits to Growth,"10 which warned that "if the world's consumption patterns and population growth continued at the same high rates of the time, the earth would strike its limits within a century."

Then, in the 1991 book, "The First Global Revolution,"11 the Club of Rome argued that depopulation policies might gain widespread support if they could be linked to an existential fight against a common enemy. An excerpt from "The First Global Revolution" reads:12

"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill."

So, in plain English, the intended result of "going green" is depopulation. This intention is now finally becoming visible when you consider the implications of eliminating oil and gas production without having viable alternatives in place, which is what Biden and other global leaders are in the process of doing.

Not only do you need oil to make fertilizer, but we also don't have farm equipment that can run on solar or wind power. So, food production essentially grinds to a halt. Heavy construction machinery also can't run on these alternative sources of energy, so there go the infrastructure and home building businesses.

To many, it seems these global leaders are acting out of ignorance, but it's quite possible their actions are intentional. It's just that no one wants to consider that the intention is to harm as many people as possible — to actually rid the planet of soon-to-be "useless" people.

It may be quite chilling to realize that the climate change threat narrative was cooked up in the late 1980s for the sole purpose of being able to implement a global depopulation agenda without stirring up excessive resistance. But depopulation and eugenics are at the heart of what the WEF and its allies are trying to achieve.

The WEF even admits they're using the Club of Rome's "planetary emergency plan" to provide "a new compass for nations" to follow.13 So, the WEF and its allied nations are all following a plan that has depopulation as an admitted intended end result.

Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War

As I discussed in "Phase 2 of the Great Reset: War," the drums of war are also part and parcel of The Great Reset plan. Why? Because war will accelerate the economic collapse required before nations can "Build Back Better."14 The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is helping to catalyze The Great Reset in a number of different ways.

For starters, supply chains of all kinds are being disrupted at an unprecedented level and pace by the war between Russia and Ukraine. Fuel shortages and inflation are also taking off. Geopolitical tensions may also trigger stagflation, an economic situation in which inflation and unemployment rates are high while economic growth slows.15

It's a precarious dilemma for economic policy, because strategies that help lower inflation can also make unemployment worse. You can learn more about this in the March 10, 2022, Conversation article, "Why Stagflation Is an Economic Nightmare."16

The end result is increased dependence on government subsidies, and this is a clear goal of The Great Reset. Universal basic income is one planned strategy that will create dependency. It will also ensure we're all equally poor and unable to threaten their monopoly on power and wealth.

Universal poverty is really what they mean when they talk about making the world "fair and equitable." No one will have anything. Everyone will be equally poor and dependent, without hope of ever being able to rise into the "elite" technocratic class.

The Ukraine war is also reducing Europe's reliance on Russian energy, thereby reinforcing the urgency of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. In lockstep with The Great Reset, policymakers around the world are using the sanctions against the Russian energy sector to accelerate the transition to "green" energy, the intention behind which is what I just discussed.

Russia's decision to block exports of fertilizer and food crops in response to being deplatformed from the Swift system will also create food shortages, and this too plays right into the Great Reset plan. In recent years, we've been urged by Great Reset front men like Bill Gates to stop eating real meat and switch to synthetic lab-grown meat instead.

Making people reliant on patented synthetic food will benefit the globalists in more ways than one. People will get sicker, and hence more reliant on government aid. They'll be dependent on food produced by monopolies and hence easier to control. And, over time, as people forget how to grow and raise food, the ability to control the global population will increase.

In addition to all of this, media are chumming the waters with fearporn about monkeypox — just in time for the push to relinquish national sovereignty to the World Health Organization, which is also allied with the WEF.

In closing, Michael Osterholm's report from the 2010 Davos meeting, which was aflame with talks about pandemic planning, having just gone through the 2009/2010 swine flu pandemic is quite telling. All those years ago, he wrote:17

"I learned much in Davos, but I was troubled by the complete lack of attention to such critical questions as:

  • How do we protect global supply chains when we face another inevitable pandemic that could bring about widespread, severe illness? ...
  • How do we take the lessons we've learned from our experience with H1N1 and embed them into our organizations so they're not forgotten?

Instead, the tenor of the conversations at Davos was about globalization ..."

Twelve years ago, the Davos billionaires, bankers and heads of state had the opportunity to prove they were capable of stewarding this Earth ship. But after the swine flu pandemic, they didn't solve the problems that had become apparent.

They didn't solve the supply chain issues, and we had the same but worse issues when COVID came along

Views: 8

Comments are closed for this blog post

Comment by carol ann parisi on June 2, 2022 at 9:48pm
 

Vaccine injury compensation programs overwhelmed as congressional reform languishes

One program covers nearly three times as many vaccines today as it did when it was created three decades ago. Despite bipartisan calls for change, Congress has failed to act.
 
 
A pair of federal programs compensating people who suffer injuries from vaccines and pandemic treatments are now facing so many claims that thousands of people may not receive payment for their injuries any time soon.
 
The first program, meant for standard vaccines, such as measles and polio, has too little staff to handle the number of reported injuries, and thousands of patients are waiting years for their cases to be heard.
 
 
A second program designed for vaccines and other treatments created or used during pandemics has seen unsustainable growth. Between 2010 and 2020, the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program received 500 complaints. In the two years since Covid-19 appeared, it has received over 8,000 complaints.
 
 
More than 5,000 of those are directly related to the Covid-19 vaccines, with injuries ranging from a sore shoulder to death, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration. An additional 3,000 complaints related to everything from drugs and devices to the failure of hospital staff to limit infection spread have also been filed.
 
Yet the pandemic fund has paid zero claims, in part because officials are waiting for people to submit detailed medical records and documentation to back up their allegations.
 
“Compensation determinations are made based on individual case reviews, and the statute sets a very high standard that a claimant must meet to be eligible for compensation,” HRSA spokesperson David Bowman said.
 
Should Covid-19 shots become routine once the pandemic ends, alleged injuries would eventually be handled by the already over-burdened standard Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Patient advocates, attorneys and the pharmaceutical industry fear that without drastic reforms, that program could collapse.
 
 

 

Despite bipartisan calls for change, Congress has failed to act, frustrating those who say that the VICP — which covers nearly three times as many vaccines today as it did when it was created three decades ago — is overwhelmed.
 
There are fears those optics could fuel vaccine hesitancy if the public mistakes the situation as too many injuries flooding the program, when in fact the number of vaccines covered by the program has grown without a commensurate increase in resources.
 
“The cost of this program failing will be like throwing kerosene on the antivax fire,” said Renee Gentry, director of George Washington University’s Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic.
 



A nursing student administers a Moderna COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination center at UNLV, in Las Vegas on April 26, 2021. | John Locher, File/ AP Photo
 



Covid-19 shots have proven to be safe for the overwhelming majority of people, but injuries do occur, as they do for all vaccines. Allergic reactions are possible, and some specific adverse events have been associated with the shots, such as myocarditis and pericarditis after messenger RNA vaccination, and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after receiving the Johnson & Johnson shot.
 


 

“The Covid vaccine injuries are still rare, but there are some very significant injuries that have destroyed lives,” Gentry said. “It’s frustrating to tell those people who did everything right … that they get nothing for that.”
 
Congress created the national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in 1986, partly as a means to avoid lawsuits against vaccine makers and health care providers amid fears that litigation could deter drug companies from producing vaccines and dampen consumer confidence in immunizations.
 
The program originally covered six routine childhood vaccinations, including measles and polio. But it’s grown to include 16 vaccines — including influenza shots, which tens of millions of people receive every year — without commensurate growth in staff or money needed to handle the additional claims.
 
The current backlog of cases is more than two years long, said Susan Steinman, senior director of policy and senior counsel at American Association for Justice, which lobbies for plaintiffs’ lawyers. There were 2,057 VICP petitions filed in fiscal 2021.
 
“It’s not supposed to take longer than actually going to court,” Steinman said. “We have this program backward right now.”
 
VICP is funded by a 75-cent excise tax on each dose of the 16 CDC-recommended vaccines and currently has nearly $4.3 billion on hand. Congress must also appropriate money from the fund to cover Department of Justice attorneys’ and the federal claims court’s work to process claims, in addition to the claims themselves.
 
 

 

Meanwhile, the CICP was created in 2010 to cover vaccines, medications and devices developed in response to a public health emergency. Injured patients and their survivors must submit a request for compensation within one year of receiving the vaccine or drug to HRSA, including medical documentation of the injury or death, with one opportunity for reconsideration if their initial petition is denied.
 
“HHS just accepts or denies the claims, there’s no judicial review, and there’s very little information about why things have been denied,” said Christina Ciampolillo, president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association.
 
A novel vaccine has never been transferred from the pandemic program to VICP — the H1N1 flu shot that debuted after that flu season began became part of the next season’s annual vaccine cocktail.
 
Should the Covid-19 vaccines become routinely recommended by the CDC — and be approved by the FDA for all age groups — it’s unclear how and when they’d be shuffled under the VICP umbrella.
 
“We think it’s very important to make sure the program is robust and patients’ claims get filed and heard in a timely fashion, and part of that is about adequate staffing and resources in the U.S. government,” said Phyllis Arthur, vice president for infectious diseases and diagnostics policy at the Biotechnology Innovation Organization.
 


A handful of bills introduced in the House and Senate would revamp both programs, but advocates are focused on two measures — one, H.R. 3655 (117) to overhaul the VICP, and another, H.R. 3656 (117) to automatically impose the excise tax that funds the program on any new vaccines the HHS secretary adds to the vaccine injury table. Currently, Congress must act for the tax to be collected on any new immunization added to the schedule.
 
 

 

The broader VICP reform legislation, an effort led by Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) in the House, would set a minimum number of special masters appointed to the court that hears vaccine injury claims, requiring a minimum of 10 compared to the current maximum of eight.
 
The legislation would change the amount of time the HHS secretary has to add a vaccine to the injury table from two years to six months and would ensure the table covers vaccines routinely recommended by the CDC to adults as well as children and pregnant people.
 
It also would increase the maximum amount of compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths from $250,000 to $600,000 for 2021, a figure that could be adjusted for inflation in later years.
 
Doggett, who leads the House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee, indicated in a statement to POLITICO that some Republicans are holding up progress on the measure, which he cosponsored with retiring GOP Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan.
 
A Republican aide suggested the bill’s potential price tag is to blame. But CBO hasn’t released an estimate for the bill, agency spokesperson Deborah Kilroe said, adding that the office is legally required to conduct a formal cost estimate after a bill is reported out of a congressional committee. Neither bill has advanced out of Energy and Commerce or Ways and Means.
 
 

 

Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) is working on a similar legislative effort to automate the VICP excise tax and to clarify how Covid-19 vaccines would transition from the CICP to the VICP.
 
“We don’t really know how the process works or what it would look like,” a Casey aide said.
 
The senator is still working on the measure, the aide added, including finding bipartisan cosponsors that could help increase the chances of the bill moving on some legislative vehicle this session. Those options are few, with a bipartisan and bicameral effort to reauthorize FDA’s medical product user fees already well underway. An omnibus spending package could also carry the measures.
 
The bills’ advocates say ensuring the programs work well is critical to bolstering public confidence in U.S. vaccination programs, so people know that, in the rare case they experience a serious adverse event post-immunization, they can be compensated for their pain.
 
As the U.S. moves closer to transitioning away from the public health emergency, Doggett said, the longstanding injury compensation program for vaccines must be ready to handle Covid-related claims.
 
“The system could easily be crushed by the new burden if the existing backlog is not quickly addressed and the program modernized,” he said.
Comment by carol ann parisi on June 2, 2022 at 8:43pm

Many questions need candid answers to intelligently ascertain what created this tragedy.  Once gathered, then will be the correct time to take meaningful steps in a sincere effort to prevent anything like it from ever happening again

 

 

I WONDER???

Where did an 18-year-old unemployed high school dropout cross dresser who lived with his grandmother get MONEY to pay for:


  1. Two brand new Daniel Defense AR15 @ $ about $2,266.00 each

  2. around 340 rounds of ammo @ about $200.00

  3. 35 ammo clips @ about $400.00

  4. Body Armor @ about $250.00

  5. Plus misc. @ about $200.00


TOTAL ESTIMATED COST @ABOUT $5,562.00

 

THIS MONEY TRAIL NEEDS TO BE RESEARCHED AND MADE PUBLIC NOW!

Comment by carol ann parisi on June 2, 2022 at 9:37am

BREAKING: Report indicates monkeypox outbreak was planned

by:  | 
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

monkeypox-outbreak-was-planned(NaturalHealth365)  As of May 27, 2022, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified multiple cases of so-called monkeypox in several U.S. states, including Massachusetts, Florida, Utah, Washington, California, Virginia, and New York.  According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the outbreak has impacted 12 countries where the disease, which has been compared to a milder version of smallpox, is not endemic.

Given how the COVID-19 pandemic has been going, perhaps it is no surprise that the Biden administration has already dumped nearly $120 million into purchasing some freeze-dried monkeypox vaxxes (you know … just in case).  But this might shock you:

Evidence suggests the outbreak was not unexpected at all … almost as if we are looking at Event 201 all over again (i.e., global bigwigs and billionaires sit around and “simulate” a pandemic and subsequent pandemic response … then a pandemic starts just a couple of months later).

Was this sudden outbreak of monkeypox actually planned?

The Nuclear Threat Initiative is a “nonprofit, nonpartisan global security organization focused on reducing nuclear and biological threats imperiling humanity,” according to their website.  Their funders and donors include none other than the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

In March 2021, NTI worked alongside the Munich Security Conference (as well as dozens of leaders from various fields, including public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy) to create a “tabletop exercise” about reducing the risk of biological threats.  A full report of their exercise, called “Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats: Results from the 2021 Tabletop Exercise Conducted in Partnership with the Munich Security Conference,” includes some incredibly eerie lines:

  • “The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months.”
  • “Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight.”
  • “By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”

Hopefully, this “fictitious” exercise is in no way an omen of future occurrences.

What is monkeypox?

Monkeypox is considered a rare viral disease.  Most people who get this illness seem to recover fully after experiencing only minor symptoms … but of course, this might not stop government officials from wanting to push yet another wave of vax hysteria onto the world.

According to the WHO, these current global monkeypox cases “have mainly but not exclusively been identified amongst men who have sex with men (MSM) seeking care in primary care and sexual health clinics.”  The WHO also identifies where monkeypox is currently endemic in the world, including Benin, Cameroon, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Ghana (identified in animals only), Ivory Coast, Liberia, Nigeria, the Republic of the Congo, Sierra Leone, and South Sudan.  Endemic means that a particular disease is consistently present at a baseline level in a certain area or population.

The signs and symptoms of monkeypox are generally mild: fever, swollen lymph nodes (which do not occur in smallpox), muscle aches, chills, fatigue, and rashes or lesions that can develop into vesicles, papules, macules, pustules, and scabs.

What do you think?  Based on the above-cited evidence, isn’t it plausible to believe that we may have another “plandemic” on our hands?

Sources for this article include:

NTI.org
CDC.gov
Fortune.com
Childrenshealthdefense.org
Michaelsenger.com
CNN.com
WHO.int
NTI.org

Comment by carol ann parisi on June 1, 2022 at 11:47pm

Comment by carol ann parisi on June 1, 2022 at 10:18pm

A few news items to start:

  • Please join us for the Brownstone Institute Supper Club, West Hartford, Connecticut, Wednesday, June 1, 2020. The amazing authors of The Great Covid Panic – Gigi Foster and Paul Frijters – are here with us (from Australia!) to give talks and answer questions. They are signing books too! We start at 5:30pm. As with last time, there is limited space. So please register ahead of time.

  • The Brownstone Institute mugs and shirts you asked for are finally here! See our new store. These products are actually great for the brand and the cause. They might cause the right person to search and find out what all the fuss is about. 

  • Some elites want to forget about the last 30 months of disaster. But Senior fellow Martin Kulldorff has tweeted that “there needs to be a brutally honest covid commission recognizing all the mistakes made.” Brownstone institute has taken steps in that direction: three reports will appear that present the full range of issues that must be confronted for accountability. 

As always, we need and very much appreciate your support

Here is some of the latest content:

Why Did US Intellectuals and Officials Celebrate and Copy China’s L... BY MICHAEL SENGER. It’s long past time for intelligence personnel to start asking why health officials and media outlets have shown such credulity in using information from the world’s worst dictatorship.

Updated Johns Hopkins Study on Lockdowns Debunks the Fact Checkers BY THORSTEINN SIGLAUGSSON. Some readers may recall the media storm against this paper, driven by some self-proclaimed fact-checkers. The appendix not only debunks all the “fact-checkers” claims but the authors also demonstrate how they were based not on any understanding of the paper (in fact it looks as if the “fact-checkers” mostly never even read it), but rather on superficial and to a large extent irrelevant “criticisms”, repeated blindly by one “fact-checker” and one media outlet after another.

Mask Mandates Back in Philadelphia  BY DEBBIE LERMAN. This should be good news, especially for parents who have been worried about their children throughout the pandemic and teachers who have been worried about exposure to the virus at schools. It’s time to stop worrying. It’s OK to take the masks off.

After Summer, Europe to Target the Unvaccinated BY ROBERT KOGON. The European Commission’s April 27th documents thus clearly invoke a new rollout of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign in the fall, specifically targeting the hitherto unvaccinated and also children. Moreover, if the Commission gets its way – as it can be expected to – and the EU Digital Covid Certificate is indeed extended, they also raise the specter of this new rollout being combined with exactly the same coercive, discriminatory measures that turned Europe’s unvaccinated into social pariahs for much of the last year.  

The Loss of Trust Is Well Earned BY JEFFREY A. TUCKER. Human freedom is the public practice of not being trolled by the ruling class, which is forever telling us that life will be better once the most intelligent and most powerful among them are granted all trust to do with our lives and property as they see fit. When we decide that it ends, it ends. 

World Economic Forum Pushes Facial Recognition Technology BY JOHN MAC GHLIONN. The dangers posed by digital IDs cannot be emphasized enough. As the researcher Brett Solomon—a man “who has tracked the advantages and perils of technology for human rights” for well over a decade—previously noted, the mass rollout of digital IDs “poses one of the gravest risks to human rights of any technology that we have encountered.”

The Corruption of the World Health Organization BY DAVID BELL. It appears the WHO’s staff are comfortable with ensuring the people they were charged to support are increasingly impoverished and their rights and health autonomy removed. They are not just resigned to the abandonment of basic public health principles and ethics, but actively working to undermine them.

The Grim Reality of Post-Lockdown Economic Trends BY DAVID STOCKMAN. In short, both the Wall Street and main street economies have been so badly roiled and distorted by lockdowns, the Fed’s money-printing spree, and Washington’s stimmy paloozas that a lot of stuff is going to “snap” as the Fed is forced into a desperate inflation-fighting mode.

Lockdown Is Not Liberalism’s Endgame BY DONALD BOUDREAUX. As summarized by Thomas Sowell, freedom under a truly liberal order “is, above all, the right of ordinary people to find elbow room for themselves and a refuge from the rampaging presumptions of their ‘betters.’”

World Health Organization Deploys Another Disease Threat to Push Gl... BY JOHN MAC GHLIONN. Vaccine passports and contact tracing are intimately tied to surveillance. More specifically, global surveillance. As the draft notes, the WHO will carry out “coordinated global surveillance of public health threats.” This can only be achieved by member states, all 194 of them, expanding their surveillance systems and contributing to “the WHO’s global systems for surveillance.”

School Closings and Violent Youth: A Potential Link BY PAUL ELIAS ALEXANDER. Is this Buffalo teen shooter and the Texas teen shooter the last such shooters? I fear not, as we may have damaged the minds of many people irreparably. There are grave consequences due to lockdowns and school closures, not only from a weakened immune system and the vast economic damage, but also due to the wrecked psyches of many young people. 

The Monkeypox Outbreak of 2003 BY JOSH STEVENSON.  Is this how every rare and exotic new pathogenic threat is going to be treated, now that we’ve got everyone’s attention for 2 years of social/political/economic upheaval? 

When 800 Mainstream US Scientists Warned Against Lockdowns BY EDWARD STRINGHAM.  Back then, hundreds of professors associated with Yale University organized a letter with signatures to send to the White House. The letter was dated March 2, 2020. It was signed by 800 credentialed professionals largely from the fields of epidemiology and medicine. It might have taken us in a different direction than the one in which governments took us soon after it was published.

Shanghai Scientists Have Adapted to Regime Priorities BY JOE WANG. The three doctors are smart people. They know all too well that the Shanghai lockdown is wrong and costing lives, but they have to use all their professional expertise in scientific paper-writing to advance the narrative of their CCP bosses. As opportunists they have chosen the CCP, so they must fulfill their Party obligations.

The WHO Treaty Is Tied to a Global Digital Passport and ID System BY AARON KHERIATY. The thrust of every one of the changes is toward increased powers and centralized powers delegated to the WHO and away from member states.

The Rise of Hepatitis BY CARLA PEETERS. A possible role of the pandemic measures in excessive inflammation in the human body by immune-liver disruptors is realistic. Independently they may each cause problems of the liver. Serious drawbacks of the measures have become most visible in children, the obese and immunocompromised and the poor.

The CDC’s $2.4M Campus Marketing Program BY DANIEL NUCCIO. Why did the CDC believe it was worthwhile to spend $2.4 million trying to convince college students to get vaccinated for a disease that poses little serious threat to most young, healthy individuals? Furthermore, why did the CDC and ACHA feel it was appropriate to peddle a potentially risky drug to young people as if it were a lifestyle brand? 

Germophobes to the Left and Right BY STEVE TEMPLETON. With two years of overreaction to and media obsession with the myriad of ways that COVID-19 can kill or permanently disable people, there’s reason to believe a major subset of the population that was faithfully adherent to public health edicts about non-pharmaceutical interventions will remain mentally scarred.

Monkeypox Was a Table-Top Simulation Only Last Year BY MICHAEL SENGER. The global Monkeypox outbreak—occurring on the exact timeline predicted by a biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak a year prior—bears a striking resemblance to the outbreak of COVID-19 just months after Event 201, a simulation of a coronavirus pandemic almost exactly like COVID-19.

Sweden’s Strategy Once Again Proven Correct BY IAN MILLER. France, Austria, Belgium, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Spain and Italy all had lockdowns, varying levels of vaccine discrimination, mask mandates and strict entry requirements. All fared worse than Sweden. The lockdown and mask apologists simply offered no explanation for this.

Monkeypox: The Next Big Scare BY JORDAN SCHACHTEL. Health authorities in the two continents have thus far identified only a few dozen cases. And while there’s no reason for concern at the moment, here’s what convinced me to put this on your radar. The U.S. government decided to order millions of doses of monkeypox v

Comment by carol ann parisi on June 1, 2022 at 10:18pm
Comment by carol ann parisi on June 1, 2022 at 7:09pm
Comment by carol ann parisi on June 1, 2022 at 6:48pm

About

© 2022   Created by carol ann parisi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service