PART(4) Principle for a Free Society DEMOCRACY
By Nigel Ashford
Realistic political participation
Most people are not very interested in politics. They have better things
to do with their lives: earning a living, spending time with their loved
ones, or enjoying the pleasures of life. Democracy does not require the
people to give more attention to politics than they wish. The minimum
is the exercise of the vote. Voters are encouraged to follow political
debate but are not required to do so.
However for the minority interested in politics, the attentive public,
there is plenty of opportunity to become involved. Democracy provides
for participation through public debate and discussion, the exercise of
the vote and by standing for office. John Stuart Mill thought that political
participation was highly desirable because it fostered in those
involved intellectual development, moral virtue, and practical understanding.
Politics is undertaken by those with the time, interest and
energy to devote to politics. The problem with direct or participatory
democracy is the same as that expressed by Oscar Wilde on socialism: it
takes up too many evenings. However ordinary voters can take advantage
of the debate amongst the politically conscious when they wish and
when exercising their vote. The value of political education was extolled
by Thomas Jefferson, US President and author of the Declaration of
Independence. “I know no safer depository of the ultimate powers of
society, but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened
enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy
is not to take it away from them, but to inform their discretion by
education.”
- 15 -
Reason, not passion
The Greek skepticism towards democracy was partly based on the
fear that the demos, the uneducated masses, were the least qualified
to take decisions. The masses would be driven by passions, emotions
and instincts, such as envy and anger, rather than reason and thoughtful
deliberation. Representative democracy is designed to ensure that, before
decisions are taken, the implications and consequences are fully considered.
The public should consider the issues carefully and present their
various opinions. The elected representatives should have the time, the
education and the wisdom to debate and consider laws and decisions
made on behalf of the people. This is why democracy should be representative
and not direct.
This is also why the elected official is a representative and not a delegate,
bound by the opinions of his voters. Edmund Burke expressed this in
his speech to the electors of Bristol. “Your representative owes you not
his industry only, but also his judgment, and he betrays, instead of
serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.” A parliament should not
act as a Congress of Ambassadors representing various interests but “ is
a deliberative assembly of one nation, with one interest, that of the
whole.” Representatives are there to consider the interests of the society
or nation as a whole and not only the interests of those who have elected
him or her.
Tags:
© 2025 Created by carol ann parisi. Powered by